The 'revenge' thing more or less vanishes and there's very little story progression to speak of. And then you proceed to get wrapped up in the politics of the coca trade, working with rebels to slowly dismantle the drug cartel's Bolivian branch. Early on, the characters remark that they just need to get that revenge and get out before getting wrapped up in the politics of the coca trade. a revenge mission? An undercover CIA guy is dead, and that's your flimsy entry into the story. Your role is that of a set of four 'operators,' in country to work for the CIA on. There, it creeps into multiple elements of society, turning the nation into a full-on, brazen narco-state. A Mexican drug cartel decides to leave home and set up shop closer to the source of its product: Bolivia. It's a shame, because there are elements around the edges of Wildlands that, if fleshed out more effectively, could have made for a better game. Leaning into the multiplayer aspect is probably the only way players will feel like they're getting their money's worth here. Single-player's also an option, and can be fun for a time, but the three AI-controlled squadmates they give you are intensely overpowered and a little boring to use. But in my experience, playing with strangers, without voice chat, is probably the worst way to play Ubi's new cocaine mountain simulator. In fact, the game constantly encourages you to do so. You can, of course, enter into public matchmaking. Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands is probably only worth caring about if you're willing to play through the game with three friends, with voice chat enabled.

Ghost recon wildlands wiki